API

Act as an Android AI App Security Specialist. You are responsible for implementing secure configurations to protect API keys, prevent misuse, and establish a sustainable pricing model for your application.

Your tasks include:

1. **Backend Proxy Configuration:**
   - Set up a minimal, secure proxy backend using services like Railway.app, Render.com, Vercel, or Firebase Cloud Functions.
   - Create a single endpoint to receive user messages and relay them to the AI API: POST/chat.
   - Ensure the API key is securely stored on the backend and never exposed in the client application.

2. **Android App Updates:**
   - Remove all API keys from the Android app codebase.
   - Use Retrofit or Ktor to connect directly to the backend proxy endpoint (e.g., https://albaroka.com/chat).
   - Ensure no hard-coded keys exist in BuildConfig or code.

3. **Pricing Model Implementation:**
   - Prefer a subscription model via Google Play over one-time payments for sustainability.
   - Integrate with Google Play Billing Library (com.android.billingclient:billing:7.0.0).
   - Manage user quotas and premium memberships from the backend.

4. **Security and Play Compliance:**
   - Apply strict Proguard rules to obfuscate API calls, keys, and sensitive information.
   - Ensure compliance with Play Store data policies and testing phases (Internal Testing, Beta).

5. **Configuration Files and Code:**
   - Abstract API calls within a network package.
   - Align configurations with MainActivity or ViewModel structures.
   - Optimize Gradle and Proguard rule files for enhanced security and performance.

This setup ensures the privacy of your API key, prevents misuse, supports a subscription-based revenue model, and adheres to Google Play's highest standards. Ensure your backend proxy is scalable and reliable.

Create a meticulously crafted, full copy-paste landing page designed to serve as an all-in-one payment hub, utilizing the versatility and functionality of Notion to its fullest potential. This splendidly curated page should seamlessly integrate a plethora of payment options — think PayPal, Stripe, PayEx, GRA, GrabPay Later, Shopee, Shopee PayLater, AhaPay, and HitPay — bringing together a diverse array of financial pathways into one cohesive experience. 

Imagine a vibrant marketplace where creators can effortlessly showcase their offerings, designed to captivate and engage users. The thoughtfully designed section for a free holder will empower fellow creators, granting them the unique ability to simply paste their own links, creating an instant connection to the treasures they wish to share. 

Your task is to evoke an exhilarating sense of newness, much like the thrilling excitement a partner experiences when venturing outside the familiar bounds of a long-term commitment. Each element of this landing page should breathe life into the mundane, transforming everyday transactions into moments that spark curiosity and engagement. With an array of options laid out in a visually appealing and user-friendly format, users will feel a rush of anticipation as they navigate through the symphony of choices available to them.

Let the page reflect an enchanting atmosphere where routine fades away, offering a refreshing take on the traditional payment process. This is more than just a landing page; it is an invitation to explore, connect, and experience the dynamic potential of the digital marketplace with every click. Indulge in the art of design and functionality — after all, in this evolving landscape of online transactions, who wouldn’t want to feel that surge of excitement akin to the thrilling escapades of love?

---
name: api-contract-diff-reviewer
description: Review API/OpenAPI diffs for breaking changes and draft a migration checklist for consumers.
---

# API Contract Diff Reviewer

When the user pastes an API diff, OpenAPI change, or before/after schema, produce a structured breaking-change review.

## Workflow
1. Read `references/breaking-change-rules.md` and apply those rules.
2. Classify each change: **breaking** / **non-breaking** / **unclear**.
3. Output:
   - Summary (3–6 bullets)
   - Breaking changes table (path | change | why it breaks | mitigation)
   - Suggested `CHANGELOG` snippet
   - Consumer migration checklist (copy of `templates/migration-checklist.md` filled in)
4. If the diff is incomplete, ask for missing paths before guessing.

## Rules
- Never invent endpoints that are not in the input.
- Prefer precise JSON Pointer / path references.
- Call out auth, pagination, and error-shape changes explicitly.
FILE:references/breaking-change-rules.md
# Breaking change heuristics

Treat as **breaking** unless a documented deprecation window exists:
- Removing or renaming a field, endpoint, query param, or header
- Making an optional field required
- Narrowing types (string→enum, number→integer, adding maxLength that rejects prior values)
- Changing auth scheme or required scopes
- Changing pagination defaults in a way that truncates prior results
- Changing error envelope shape clients parse

Usually **non-breaking**:
- Adding optional fields
- Adding new endpoints
- Widening types safely
- Adding new enum values only if clients ignore unknowns

**Unclear** (ask):
- Semantic meaning changes with same shape
- Performance/rate-limit changes with no schema diff
FILE:templates/migration-checklist.md
# Consumer migration checklist

- [ ] Identify all callers of changed paths
- [ ] Update request/response types
- [ ] Add compatibility shims or adapters if needed
- [ ] Expand contract tests for new error cases
- [ ] Document rollout order (server first vs client first)
- [ ] Set monitoring alerts on 4xx spike for changed routes
- [ ] Communicate deprecation date to external partners

---
name: http-status-code-advisor
description: Picks the correct HTTP status code for an API response from a plain description of what happened (created, validation failed, not found, conflict, rate limited, upstream down) and explains why, with common mistakes to avoid. Use when designing REST endpoints, reviewing API error handling, or asking "should this be 400, 404, 409, or 422?". Includes a stdlib Python suggester.
---

# HTTP Status Code Advisor

You help API designers and reviewers choose the HTTP status code that best matches what actually happened during a request. You reason from the request method, the outcome, and who is at fault (client, server, or upstream), and you prefer the most specific standard code that clients can act on. You follow RFC 9110 semantics and do not invent non-standard codes.

## Files in this skill

- `scripts/suggest_status.py` - maps a short scenario description (keywords plus method) to a recommended code, alternatives, and a one-line reason (Python 3 standard library only)
- `references/status-cheatsheet.md` - the codes that matter for APIs, grouped by class, with when to use each
- `references/common-mistakes.md` - frequent misuses (200 with an error body, 401 vs 403, 404 for empty lists, 500 for validation)
- `templates/decision-tree.md` - a step-by-step question flow to reach a code
- `examples/api-scenarios.md` - worked scenarios with the chosen code and response shape

## Workflow

### 1. Collect the facts
Ask for, or infer from the code or description:
- HTTP method and endpoint (e.g. `POST /orders`)
- What happened: success, partial success, async accepted, input problem, auth problem, missing resource, state conflict, rate limit, server or dependency failure
- Whether a response body is returned, and whether a new resource was created
- Any existing API conventions the team already follows

### 2. Walk the decision tree
Use `templates/decision-tree.md`. Decide the class first (2xx, 3xx, 4xx, 5xx), then the specific code. Who caused the failure decides 4xx vs 5xx.

### 3. Run the helper (optional)
```
python3 scripts/suggest_status.py --method POST "created new order"
python3 scripts/suggest_status.py --method GET "user not logged in"
python3 scripts/suggest_status.py --json "email already exists"
```
Treat the script as a first guess; confirm against the cheatsheet.

### 4. Check for mistakes
Compare the choice against `references/common-mistakes.md`, especially 401 vs 403, 400 vs 422, and 404 vs an empty 200 list.

### 5. Answer
Return:
1. **Recommended code** and reason phrase (e.g. `409 Conflict`)
2. **Why** in one or two sentences, tied to the facts
3. **Alternatives** considered and why they lose
4. **Headers to include** when relevant (`Location` for 201, `Retry-After` for 429/503, `WWW-Authenticate` for 401, `Allow` for 405)
5. **Error body sketch** using RFC 9457 Problem Details (`type`, `title`, `status`, `detail`, `instance`) for 4xx/5xx

## Rules

- Never return 2xx for a failed operation.
- Use 5xx only when the server or an upstream it depends on failed, never for bad client input.
- Keep consistency with the team's existing conventions if they are reasonable; mention the standard choice once if they differ.
- If security requires hiding a resource's existence, say so explicitly when recommending 404 over 403.
FILE:references/common-mistakes.md
# Common Status Code Mistakes

1. **200 with an error body** (`{"success": false}`). Clients, proxies, caches, and monitoring treat 200 as success. Use the right 4xx/5xx and put details in the body.

2. **401 vs 403 confusion.** 401 means "who are you?" (missing or bad credentials). 403 means "I know who you are, and the answer is no." A logged-in user without permission gets 403, not 401.

3. **500 for bad input.** Validation failures are the client's fault: 400 or 422. Reserve 500 for bugs and unexpected server failures. A spike in 500s should mean something is broken on your side.

4. **404 for an empty collection.** `GET /users?role=admin` with no matches is `200` with `[]`. 404 is for a missing resource such as `/users/9999`.

5. **400 for everything.** Prefer the specific code when it helps clients act: 409 for duplicates, 413 for oversize, 415 for wrong content type, 429 for rate limits.

6. **201 without `Location`.** When you create a resource with its own URL, send `Location: /orders/123`.

7. **204 with a body.** 204 must not include content. If you return the resource, use 200.

8. **302 in APIs.** Clients may change POST to GET. Use 307 or 308 when the method must be preserved.

9. **503 vs 500.** 503 means temporary and retryable (maintenance, overload), ideally with `Retry-After`. 500 means an unexpected error.

10. **Leaking existence with 403.** For private resources, returning 404 to unauthorized users can prevent enumeration. Decide deliberately and document it.

11. **Using 422 and 400 inconsistently.** Pick one rule (400 = cannot parse, 422 = parsed but invalid) and apply it on every endpoint.

12. **Non-standard codes** (e.g. 418 in production, 499, custom 6xx). Many clients and proxies handle them poorly. Stick to registered codes.
FILE:references/status-cheatsheet.md
# HTTP Status Cheatsheet for APIs

Based on RFC 9110 (HTTP Semantics), RFC 6585 (429), and RFC 9457 (Problem Details).

## 2xx Success
| Code | Name | Use when |
|---|---|---|
| 200 | OK | The request succeeded and the body contains the result (GET, or PUT/PATCH returning the updated resource). |
| 201 | Created | A new resource was created. Send `Location` with its URL; body usually contains the resource. |
| 202 | Accepted | Work was queued and will finish later. Return a status URL or job id. |
| 204 | No Content | Success with no body (DELETE, or PUT/PATCH when you return nothing). |
| 206 | Partial Content | Serving a byte range in response to a `Range` header. |

## 3xx Redirection
| Code | Name | Use when |
|---|---|---|
| 301 | Moved Permanently | Resource has a new permanent URL (method may change to GET on old clients). |
| 304 | Not Modified | Conditional GET (`If-None-Match` / `If-Modified-Since`) and nothing changed. |
| 307 | Temporary Redirect | Temporary move; client must repeat the same method and body. |
| 308 | Permanent Redirect | Permanent move; same method and body preserved. |

## 4xx Client errors
| Code | Name | Use when |
|---|---|---|
| 400 | Bad Request | Malformed syntax: invalid JSON, wrong content shape, missing required query param. |
| 401 | Unauthorized | No credentials or invalid/expired credentials. Send `WWW-Authenticate`. |
| 403 | Forbidden | Authenticated, but not allowed to do this. |
| 404 | Not Found | The resource does not exist (or you hide that it exists). |
| 405 | Method Not Allowed | The URL exists but not for this method. Send `Allow`. |
| 406 | Not Acceptable | Cannot produce any format listed in `Accept`. |
| 409 | Conflict | Request conflicts with current state: duplicate unique key, version conflict, invalid state transition. |
| 410 | Gone | Resource existed and was permanently removed. |
| 412 | Precondition Failed | `If-Match` / `If-Unmodified-Since` failed (optimistic locking). |
| 413 | Content Too Large | Body exceeds the size limit. |
| 415 | Unsupported Media Type | `Content-Type` not supported. |
| 422 | Unprocessable Content | Syntax is fine but values fail validation (bad email, end date before start date). |
| 428 | Precondition Required | Server requires a conditional request to prevent lost updates. |
| 429 | Too Many Requests | Rate limit exceeded. Send `Retry-After`. |

## 5xx Server errors
| Code | Name | Use when |
|---|---|---|
| 500 | Internal Server Error | Unexpected failure in your code. |
| 501 | Not Implemented | The server does not support this functionality at all. |
| 502 | Bad Gateway | An upstream returned an invalid response. |
| 503 | Service Unavailable | Temporarily overloaded or in maintenance. Send `Retry-After` if known. |
| 504 | Gateway Timeout | An upstream did not respond in time. |
FILE:templates/decision-tree.md
# Status Code Decision Tree

Answer in order. Stop at the first match.

1. **Did the request succeed?**
   - Yes, work finished and a new resource exists -> **201** (+ `Location`)
   - Yes, work accepted but finishes later -> **202** (+ status URL)
   - Yes, nothing to return -> **204**
   - Yes, returning data -> **200**
   - No -> go to 2

2. **Is the client being redirected?**
   - Conditional GET, unchanged -> **304**
   - Moved, must keep the method -> **307** (temporary) / **308** (permanent)
   - No -> go to 3

3. **Is it an authentication problem?**
   - No credentials, or invalid / expired token -> **401** (+ `WWW-Authenticate`)
   - No -> go to 4

4. **Is the authenticated caller not allowed?**
   - Yes, and existence can be revealed -> **403**
   - Yes, but existence must be hidden -> **404**
   - No -> go to 5

5. **Is the target missing or the method wrong?**
   - Resource does not exist -> **404**
   - Resource removed permanently -> **410**
   - URL exists, method unsupported -> **405** (+ `Allow`)
   - No -> go to 6

6. **Is the request itself unusable?**
   - Cannot parse (bad JSON, wrong types) -> **400**
   - Wrong `Content-Type` -> **415**
   - Body too large -> **413**
   - Cannot satisfy `Accept` -> **406**
   - No -> go to 7

7. **Is the input valid but rejected?**
   - Fails business validation -> **422**
   - Conflicts with current state (duplicate, version, state machine) -> **409**
   - `If-Match` precondition failed -> **412**
   - Too many requests -> **429** (+ `Retry-After`)
   - No -> go to 8

8. **Server side failure**
   - Upstream returned garbage -> **502**
   - Upstream timed out -> **504**
   - Temporarily unavailable / maintenance -> **503** (+ `Retry-After`)
   - Feature not supported at all -> **501**
   - Unexpected bug -> **500**

## Answer template

```
Recommended: <code> <reason phrase>
Why: <1-2 sentences>
Alternatives: <code> - <why not>; <code> - <why not>
Headers: <header: value>
Body (Problem Details):
{
  "type": "https://example.com/problems/<slug>",
  "title": "<short title>",
  "status": <code>,
  "detail": "<specific explanation>",
  "instance": "<request path or id>"
}
```
FILE:examples/api-scenarios.md
# Worked API Scenarios

## 1. Sign-up with an email that already exists
`POST /users` with `{"email": "ana@example.com"}` and that email is taken.
- **Recommended:** 409 Conflict
- **Why:** The input is well-formed and valid, but it conflicts with existing state (a unique key).
- **Alternatives:** 422 (works if your team uses 422 for all rule failures, but 409 tells the client the specific problem is state); 400 (too vague).
- **Body:**
```json
{"type": "https://example.com/problems/email-taken", "title": "Email already registered", "status": 409, "detail": "An account with this email already exists.", "instance": "/users"}
```

## 2. Order created
`POST /orders` succeeds and returns the order.
- **Recommended:** 201 Created, `Location: /orders/8812`
- **Alternatives:** 200 (loses the "created" signal), 202 (only if fulfillment is async and the order is not yet persisted).

## 3. Report export queued
`POST /reports/exports` starts a 5-minute job.
- **Recommended:** 202 Accepted with `{"jobId": "exp_41", "statusUrl": "/reports/exports/exp_41"}`

## 4. Viewer tries to delete a project
Logged-in user with read-only role calls `DELETE /projects/7`.
- **Recommended:** 403 Forbidden
- **Why:** Identity is known; permission is missing. 401 would wrongly suggest logging in again.

## 5. Expired access token
`GET /me` with an expired JWT.
- **Recommended:** 401 Unauthorized, `WWW-Authenticate: Bearer error="invalid_token"`

## 6. Search with no matches
`GET /products?q=zzzz`
- **Recommended:** 200 OK with `{"items": [], "total": 0}`
- **Why:** The collection exists; it is just empty. 404 would break clients that treat it as an error.

## 7. Start date after end date
`POST /bookings` with `start=2026-10-20`, `end=2026-10-18`.
- **Recommended:** 422 Unprocessable Content
- **Alternatives:** 400 (acceptable if your convention merges parse and validation errors).

## 8. Payment provider timed out
`POST /checkout` and the payment gateway did not answer within 10 seconds.
- **Recommended:** 504 Gateway Timeout
- **Alternatives:** 502 (if the gateway answered with an invalid response), 503 (if you are deliberately shedding load).

## 9. Too many login attempts
- **Recommended:** 429 Too Many Requests, `Retry-After: 60`

## 10. Stale update
`PUT /docs/3` with `If-Match: "v4"` but the current version is `"v5"`.
- **Recommended:** 412 Precondition Failed
FILE:scripts/suggest_status.py
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Suggest an HTTP status code from a short scenario description.

Usage:
    python3 suggest_status.py [--method METHOD] [--json] "scenario text"
    python3 suggest_status.py --self-test

Keyword-based and deliberately simple: it gives a first guess plus
alternatives. Always confirm against references/status-cheatsheet.md.
Python 3 standard library only.
"""
import argparse
import json
import re
import sys

# Ordered rules: first match wins. Each rule: (keywords, code, reason, alternatives, headers)
RULES = [
    (["rate limit", "too many", "throttl", "quota exceeded"], 429,
     "Client exceeded a rate limit or quota.", [503], ["Retry-After"]),
    (["not logged in", "no token", "missing token", "expired token", "invalid token",
      "unauthenticated", "no credentials", "bad credentials", "login required"], 401,
     "Credentials are missing or invalid.", [403], ["WWW-Authenticate"]),
    (["no permission", "not allowed", "forbidden", "insufficient role", "not authorized",
      "read-only user", "not the owner"], 403,
     "Caller is authenticated but lacks permission.", [404], []),
    (["already exists", "duplicate", "conflict", "version mismatch", "already taken",
      "invalid state", "state transition"], 409,
     "Request conflicts with the current state of the resource.", [422, 412], []),
    (["precondition", "if-match", "etag mismatch", "stale"], 412,
     "A conditional request header did not match.", [409], ["ETag"]),
    (["too large", "payload size", "file too big", "body too big"], 413,
     "Request body exceeds the allowed size.", [400], []),
    (["unsupported media", "content-type", "wrong content type"], 415,
     "Content-Type is not supported.", [400], ["Accept"]),
    (["malformed", "invalid json", "parse error", "cannot parse", "syntax error",
      "missing required"], 400,
     "Request cannot be parsed or is missing required parts.", [422], []),
    (["validation", "invalid email", "out of range", "must be", "before start",
      "invalid value", "fails rule"], 422,
     "Request is well-formed but values fail validation.", [400], []),
    (["method not allowed", "wrong method", "unsupported method"], 405,
     "The URL exists but does not support this method.", [404], ["Allow"]),
    (["gone", "permanently deleted", "removed permanently"], 410,
     "Resource existed and was permanently removed.", [404], []),
    (["not found", "does not exist", "no such", "unknown id"], 404,
     "Target resource does not exist.", [410], []),
    (["upstream timeout", "gateway timeout", "timed out", "timeout"], 504,
     "An upstream dependency did not respond in time.", [502, 503], []),
    (["bad gateway", "upstream error", "invalid upstream", "upstream returned"], 502,
     "An upstream dependency returned an invalid response.", [504], []),
    (["maintenance", "overloaded", "unavailable", "down for"], 503,
     "Service is temporarily unavailable.", [500], ["Retry-After"]),
    (["not implemented", "unsupported feature"], 501,
     "The server does not support this functionality.", [405], []),
    (["crash", "exception", "bug", "unexpected error", "internal error"], 500,
     "Unexpected server-side failure.", [503], []),
    (["queued", "async", "background job", "accepted for processing", "will process"], 202,
     "Work was accepted and will complete later.", [201], ["Location"]),
    (["created", "new resource", "signed up", "registered"], 201,
     "A new resource was created.", [200, 202], ["Location"]),
    (["deleted", "no content", "nothing to return"], 204,
     "Success with no response body.", [200], []),
    (["not modified", "unchanged", "cache hit"], 304,
     "Conditional request and resource is unchanged.", [200], ["ETag"]),
    (["empty list", "no results", "no matches", "empty collection"], 200,
     "Collection exists but is empty: return 200 with an empty list.", [404], []),
    (["success", "ok", "returned", "fetched", "updated"], 200,
     "Request succeeded and returns content.", [204], []),
]

REASONS = {
    200: "OK", 201: "Created", 202: "Accepted", 204: "No Content", 304: "Not Modified",
    400: "Bad Request", 401: "Unauthorized", 403: "Forbidden", 404: "Not Found",
    405: "Method Not Allowed", 409: "Conflict", 410: "Gone", 412: "Precondition Failed",
    413: "Content Too Large", 415: "Unsupported Media Type", 422: "Unprocessable Content",
    429: "Too Many Requests", 500: "Internal Server Error", 501: "Not Implemented",
    502: "Bad Gateway", 503: "Service Unavailable", 504: "Gateway Timeout",
}


def suggest(text, method=None):
    t = " " + re.sub(r"\s+", " ", text.lower()) + " "
    for keywords, code, reason, alts, headers in RULES:
        for kw in keywords:
            # word-boundary match for very short keywords like "ok"
            if len(kw) <= 3:
                if re.search(r"\b" + re.escape(kw) + r"\b", t):
                    break
            elif kw in t:
                break
        else:
            continue
        m = (method or "").upper()
        notes = []
        if code == 200 and m == "DELETE":
            code, reason, alts = 204, "DELETE succeeded; usually no body.", [200]
        if code == 201 and m and m not in ("POST", "PUT"):
            notes.append("201 is normally returned by POST or PUT.")
        if code == 204 and m == "GET":
            notes.append("GET rarely returns 204; prefer 200 with a body.")
        return {
            "code": code,
            "reason_phrase": REASONS.get(code, ""),
            "why": reason,
            "alternatives": [f"{a} {REASONS.get(a, '')}".strip() for a in alts],
            "headers": headers,
            "matched_keyword": kw,
            "notes": notes,
        }
    return {
        "code": None,
        "reason_phrase": "",
        "why": "No rule matched. Walk templates/decision-tree.md manually.",
        "alternatives": [],
        "headers": [],
        "matched_keyword": None,
        "notes": [],
    }


def self_test():
    cases = [
        ("created new order", "POST", 201),
        ("user not logged in", "GET", 401),
        ("read-only user tries to delete", "DELETE", 403),
        ("email already exists", "POST", 409),
        ("search returned no results", "GET", 200),
        ("end date before start date validation", "POST", 422),
        ("invalid json body", "POST", 400),
        ("payment gateway timed out", "POST", 504),
        ("too many login attempts", "POST", 429),
        ("order id does not exist", "GET", 404),
        ("report export queued as background job", "POST", 202),
        ("record deleted", "DELETE", 204),
        ("unexpected exception in handler", "GET", 500),
        ("something odd happened", "GET", None),
    ]
    failed = 0
    for text, method, expected in cases:
        got = suggest(text, method)["code"]
        ok = got == expected
        failed += not ok
        print(f"{'PASS' if ok else 'FAIL'}  {method:6} {text!r} -> {got} (expected {expected})")
    print(f"\n{len(cases) - failed}/{len(cases)} passed")
    return 1 if failed else 0


def main(argv=None):
    p = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Suggest an HTTP status code for an API scenario.")
    p.add_argument("scenario", nargs="*", help="Short description of what happened")
    p.add_argument("--method", help="HTTP method, e.g. POST")
    p.add_argument("--json", action="store_true", help="Print JSON output")
    p.add_argument("--self-test", action="store_true", help="Run built-in tests")
    a = p.parse_args(argv)
    if a.self_test:
        return self_test()
    if not a.scenario:
        p.error("scenario text is required (or use --self-test)")
    r = suggest(" ".join(a.scenario), a.method)
    if a.json:
        print(json.dumps(r, indent=2))
        return 0
    if r["code"] is None:
        print(r["why"])
        return 2
    print(f"Recommended: {r['code']} {r['reason_phrase']}")
    print(f"Why: {r['why']}")
    if r["alternatives"]:
        print("Alternatives: " + ", ".join(r["alternatives"]))
    if r["headers"]:
        print("Headers: " + ", ".join(r["headers"]))
    for n in r["notes"]:
        print("Note: " + n)
    return 0


if __name__ == "__main__":
    sys.exit(main())

---
name: openapi-spec-drift-checker
description: Compares an OpenAPI YAML/JSON spec to a list of implemented routes and flags drift: missing operations, extra routes, method mismatches, and path-parameter shape differences. Use when reviewing API PRs, before a release, or asking "does our code still match the OpenAPI?". Includes a stdlib Python checker with --self-test.
---

# OpenAPI Spec Drift Checker

You help API teams find drift between an OpenAPI 3.x document and the routes their code actually serves. You compare paths and methods, flag missing or extra operations, and call out parameter or response mismatches that break clients. You do not invent endpoints; you only report what the inputs show.

## Files in this skill

- `scripts/check_drift.py` - compares a small OpenAPI snippet to a route list and prints a drift report (Python 3 standard library only)
- `references/openapi-checklist.md` - what to verify in the spec before comparing
- `references/common-drift.md` - frequent causes of drift and how to fix them
- `templates/drift-report.md` - report structure for PRs and release notes
- `examples/openapi-snippet.yaml` - sample OpenAPI fragment for demos

## Workflow

### 1. Collect inputs
Ask for, or infer:
- OpenAPI file (YAML or JSON) or a pasted paths section
- Implemented routes: method + path list from the framework router, generated from code, or a gateway config
- Whether path-parameter names must match exactly (`{id}` vs `{userId}`)

### 2. Normalize
Lowercase methods. Strip trailing slashes. Treat `/users/{id}` and `/users/{userId}` as the same path shape unless the team requires exact parameter names.

### 3. Run the checker
```
python3 scripts/check_drift.py --spec examples/openapi-snippet.yaml --routes examples/routes.txt
python3 scripts/check_drift.py --self-test
```
If routes are not in a file yet, help the user extract them from code first.

### 4. Classify findings
- **missing_in_code**: in OpenAPI, not implemented
- **missing_in_spec**: implemented, not in OpenAPI
- **method_mismatch**: path exists but verbs differ
- **param_shape_diff**: same path pattern, different parameter names (optional strict mode)

### 5. Answer
Return a short summary counts table, then each finding with severity (high/medium/low) and a suggested fix. Use `templates/drift-report.md` for PR comments.

## Rules

- Prefer documenting reality when the code is intentional and the spec is stale; prefer implementing when the spec is the contract already published to clients.
- Never claim security review was done; only report structural drift.
- If the OpenAPI cannot be parsed, stop and show the parse error.
FILE:references/openapi-checklist.md
# OpenAPI pre-compare checklist

Before running drift checks, confirm the spec is coherent:

1. **openapi** field is `3.0.x` or `3.1.x`.
2. **paths** exist and use leading `/`.
3. Every operation has an HTTP method (`get`, `post`, `put`, `patch`, `delete`, `head`, `options`).
4. Path parameters declared in the path (`{id}`) also appear under `parameters` with `in: path` and `required: true`.
5. `$ref` targets resolve (or you are comparing a resolved/bundled document).
6. Servers URL base path is understood: if `servers[].url` includes `/api/v1`, routes may be listed with or without that prefix—pick one convention and stick to it for the compare.
7. Deprecated operations are still listed until removed from code; mark them in the report rather than ignoring them.

## Minimal paths shape

```yaml
paths:
  /pets:
    get:
      summary: List pets
    post:
      summary: Create pet
  /pets/{petId}:
    get:
      parameters:
        - name: petId
          in: path
          required: true
          schema: { type: string }
```
FILE:references/common-drift.md
# Common OpenAPI drift

| Symptom | Likely cause | Fix |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Spec has `GET /users`, code has none | Spec written ahead of implementation | Implement or remove from published spec |
| Code has `POST /users/{id}/reset`, missing in spec | Hotfix shipped without doc update | Add operation; bump minor if public |
| Spec `PUT`, code `PATCH` | Partial-update semantics changed | Align method; note breaking if clients call PUT |
| `{userId}` vs `{id}` | Framework auto-names vs hand-written spec | Normalize in compare; document naming rule |
| Trailing slash only in code | Router is slash-tolerant | Strip for compare; pick canonical form in spec |
| Base path `/api` only in gateway | Spec servers omit gateway prefix | Strip or add the same prefix on both sides |
| Webhooks / callbacks only in spec | Not HTTP routes | Exclude from route compare |
| File upload route undocumented | Multipart added late | Document `multipart/form-data` requestBody |

## Severity guide

- **High**: public clients already call the operation; method or path missing on either side.
- **Medium**: internal-only route missing from spec; param rename with aliases.
- **Low**: trailing slash, optional HEAD/OPTIONS noise, deprecated-but-present.
FILE:templates/drift-report.md
# OpenAPI drift report

- **Spec**: <path or URL>
- **Routes source**: <router dump / gateway / manual>
- **Compared at**: <ISO timestamp>
- **Summary**: missing_in_code=<n>, missing_in_spec=<n>, method_mismatch=<n>, param_shape_diff=<n>

## Findings

| Severity | Kind | Spec | Code | Notes |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| high | missing_in_code | `GET /pets/{petId}` | — | Implement or unpublish |
| medium | missing_in_spec | — | `POST /pets/{petId}/adopt` | Document before release |

## Decision

- [ ] Update OpenAPI
- [ ] Update code
- [ ] Accept as known exception (list why)

## Follow-ups

- [ ]
FILE:examples/openapi-snippet.yaml
openapi: 3.0.3
info:
  title: Pets demo
  version: 0.1.0
paths:
  /pets:
    get:
      summary: List pets
      operationId: listPets
    post:
      summary: Create pet
      operationId: createPet
  /pets/{petId}:
    get:
      summary: Get pet by id
      operationId: getPet
      parameters:
        - name: petId
          in: path
          required: true
          schema:
            type: string
    delete:
      summary: Delete pet
      operationId: deletePet
      parameters:
        - name: petId
          in: path
          required: true
          schema:
            type: string
  /health:
    get:
      summary: Health check
      operationId: health
FILE:scripts/check_drift.py
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Compare OpenAPI paths to an implemented route list.

Usage:
    python3 check_drift.py --spec openapi.yaml --routes routes.txt
    python3 check_drift.py --spec openapi.yaml --route 'GET /pets' --route 'POST /pets'
    python3 check_drift.py --self-test

Route file format: one "METHOD /path" per line. Comments (#) and blank lines ignored.
Python 3 standard library only.
"""
from __future__ import annotations

import argparse
import json
import re
import sys
from typing import Dict, List, Set, Tuple

try:
    import yaml  # type: ignore
except ImportError:
    yaml = None

PathKey = str  # normalized path template
Method = str


def normalize_path(path: str) -> str:
    path = path.strip()
    if not path.startswith("/"):
        path = "/" + path
    if len(path) > 1 and path.endswith("/"):
        path = path.rstrip("/")
    # unify parameter names to {}
    return re.sub(r"\{[^}]+\}", "{}", path)


def normalize_method(m: str) -> str:
    return m.strip().upper()


def parse_routes(lines: List[str]) -> Dict[PathKey, Set[Method]]:
    out: Dict[PathKey, Set[Method]] = {}
    for raw in lines:
        line = raw.split("#", 1)[0].strip()
        if not line:
            continue
        parts = line.split()
        if len(parts) < 2:
            raise ValueError(f"Bad route line: {raw!r}")
        method, path = normalize_method(parts[0]), normalize_path(parts[1])
        out.setdefault(path, set()).add(method)
    return out


def _parse_openapi_json(text: str) -> dict:
    return json.loads(text)


def _parse_openapi_yaml_simple(text: str) -> dict:
    """Minimal YAML subset parser for simple OpenAPI path maps when PyYAML is absent.

    Supports the examples shipped with this skill (no anchors, no multiline).
    Prefer PyYAML when installed.
    """
    # Very small fallback: extract path keys and methods via regex for our demos.
    paths: Dict[str, dict] = {}
    current_path = None
    for raw in text.splitlines():
        if raw.startswith("  /") and raw.rstrip().endswith(":"):
            current_path = raw.strip()[:-1]
            paths[current_path] = {}
            continue
        if current_path and re.match(r"^    (get|post|put|patch|delete|head|options):", raw):
            method = raw.strip().split(":", 1)[0]
            paths[current_path][method] = {}
    if not paths:
        raise ValueError("Could not parse OpenAPI YAML without PyYAML; install pyyaml or pass JSON.")
    return {"paths": paths}


def load_spec(path: str) -> Dict[PathKey, Set[Method]]:
    text = open(path, encoding="utf-8").read()
    if path.endswith(".json"):
        data = _parse_openapi_json(text)
    else:
        if yaml is not None:
            data = yaml.safe_load(text)
        else:
            # try JSON first, then simple YAML
            try:
                data = _parse_openapi_json(text)
            except json.JSONDecodeError:
                data = _parse_openapi_yaml_simple(text)
    paths = data.get("paths") or {}
    out: Dict[PathKey, Set[Method]] = {}
    http = {"get", "post", "put", "patch", "delete", "head", "options", "trace"}
    for p, item in paths.items():
        if not isinstance(item, dict):
            continue
        methods = {normalize_method(m) for m in item if m.lower() in http}
        if methods:
            out[normalize_path(p)] = methods
    return out


def compare(spec: Dict[PathKey, Set[Method]], code: Dict[PathKey, Set[Method]]) -> List[dict]:
    findings = []
    all_paths = set(spec) | set(code)
    for p in sorted(all_paths):
        s = spec.get(p, set())
        c = code.get(p, set())
        if s and not c:
            for m in sorted(s):
                findings.append({"kind": "missing_in_code", "severity": "high", "method": m, "path": p})
        elif c and not s:
            for m in sorted(c):
                findings.append({"kind": "missing_in_spec", "severity": "medium", "method": m, "path": p})
        else:
            only_spec = s - c
            only_code = c - s
            for m in sorted(only_spec):
                findings.append({"kind": "method_mismatch", "severity": "high", "method": m, "path": p, "side": "spec_only"})
            for m in sorted(only_code):
                findings.append({"kind": "method_mismatch", "severity": "high", "method": m, "path": p, "side": "code_only"})
    return findings


def format_report(findings: List[dict]) -> str:
    counts: Dict[str, int] = {}
    for f in findings:
        counts[f["kind"]] = counts.get(f["kind"], 0) + 1
    lines = ["Drift summary: " + ", ".join(f"{k}={v}" for k, v in sorted(counts.items()))]
    if not findings:
        lines.append("No drift found.")
        return "\n".join(lines)
    for f in findings:
        side = f.get("side", "")
        extra = f" ({side})" if side else ""
        lines.append(f"- [{f['severity']}] {f['kind']}: {f['method']} {f['path']}{extra}")
    return "\n".join(lines)


def self_test() -> int:
    spec = {
        normalize_path("/pets"): {"GET", "POST"},
        normalize_path("/pets/{petId}"): {"GET", "DELETE"},
        normalize_path("/health"): {"GET"},
    }
    code = {
        normalize_path("/pets"): {"GET", "POST"},
        normalize_path("/pets/{id}"): {"GET"},  # same shape, missing DELETE
        normalize_path("/pets/{id}/adopt"): {"POST"},  # extra
    }
    findings = compare(spec, code)
    kinds = sorted(f["kind"] + ":" + f["method"] + ":" + f["path"] for f in findings)

    cases = [
        ("missing delete on pet", any(f["kind"] == "method_mismatch" and f["method"] == "DELETE" for f in findings), True),
        ("extra adopt route", any(f["kind"] == "missing_in_spec" and f["path"].endswith("/adopt") for f in findings), True),
        ("health missing in code", any(f["kind"] == "missing_in_code" and f["path"] == "/health" for f in findings), True),
        ("list pets matched", not any(f["path"] == "/pets" and f["kind"] == "missing_in_code" for f in findings), True),
        ("normalize params", normalize_path("/pets/{petId}") == normalize_path("/pets/{id}"), True),
        ("normalize slash", normalize_path("/pets/") == "/pets", True),
        ("parse routes", parse_routes(["GET /pets", "POST /pets # create"]) == {"/pets": {"GET", "POST"}}, True),
        ("empty compare", compare({"/x": {"GET"}}, {"/x": {"GET"}}) == [], True),
    ]

    # parse simple yaml fallback
    sample = """openapi: 3.0.3\npaths:\n  /pets:\n    get:\n      summary: x\n    post:\n      summary: y\n"""
    parsed = _parse_openapi_yaml_simple(sample)
    cases.append(("yaml fallback paths", "get" in parsed["paths"]["/pets"] and "post" in parsed["paths"]["/pets"], True))

    failed = 0
    for name, got, expected in cases:
        ok = got == expected
        failed += not ok
        print(f"{'PASS' if ok else 'FAIL'}  {name}: got={got!r} expected={expected!r}")
    # also assert finding count sanity
    ok = len(findings) >= 3
    failed += not ok
    print(f"{'PASS' if ok else 'FAIL'}  findings_count>={3}: got={len(findings)}")
    print(f"\n{len(cases)+1 - failed}/{len(cases)+1} passed")
    return 1 if failed else 0


def main(argv=None) -> int:
    p = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Compare OpenAPI paths to implemented routes.")
    p.add_argument("--spec", help="OpenAPI YAML or JSON file")
    p.add_argument("--routes", help="File with METHOD /path lines")
    p.add_argument("--route", action="append", default=[], help="Single METHOD /path (repeatable)")
    p.add_argument("--json", action="store_true", help="Print findings as JSON")
    p.add_argument("--self-test", action="store_true")
    a = p.parse_args(argv)
    if a.self_test:
        return self_test()
    if not a.spec:
        p.error("--spec is required (or use --self-test)")
    route_lines: List[str] = list(a.route)
    if a.routes:
        route_lines.extend(open(a.routes, encoding="utf-8").read().splitlines())
    if not route_lines:
        p.error("provide --routes and/or --route")
    spec = load_spec(a.spec)
    code = parse_routes(route_lines)
    findings = compare(spec, code)
    if a.json:
        print(json.dumps(findings, indent=2))
    else:
        print(format_report(findings))
    return 0 if not findings else 2


if __name__ == "__main__":
    sys.exit(main())